Look to the subway walls

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
wheresurboytonighthelookslikeenj
transrevolutions

let me see how to say this. there are. uh. concerning connections between depictions of grantaire and enjolras as the "reasonable normal guy" vs. the "ridiculous over the top activist". it reminds me in a lot of cases of the "anti-sjw" rhetoric that is popular in some corners on the internet.

like the idea that protesting is stupid, everyone's gonna get themselves killed, the mean angry activist trope, painting cynicism not even excused in canon as 'rational' and 'sensible', stating in basically narrative voice that fighting for change is dumb and pointless and all the people doing it are sensitive assholes, unlike Real Man who is a Normal person doing Normal Things like not giving a shit about oppressed groups.

I don't think it's always on purpose or that the people writing these things are strictly always reactionaries, but there is a venn diagram here and I don't like it.

a-la-sante-du-progres

That's because USians are terrified of radical change, probably because they've been stuffed by decades of red scare. Every American product I've ever seen features revolutionaries as equally bad as the system and often worse of as good but naive and totally hopeless.

Anyway rational conservative R vs crazy sjw Enjolras is not only disrespectful toward Enjolras or Hugo himself, but it's a strong misinterpretation and a disservice to brick Grantaire as well. Grantaire is extremely pessimistic about the human nature and thinks history repeats itself so change is difficult but he also states that:

-Progress is the right direction

-It would be better if progress would be achievable gradually

-Revolution is necessary

(Those first three points are very similar to Combeferre's opinion)

-Imperialism = patriarchy and he despises both evidently

-Western Europe has a superiority complex

-Countries that wage war aren't worthy of being defined civil

-Economic inequality is bad and rich people should redistribute their wealth

-He goes with Combeferre after the to be free burn

-He thinks tyrants are ridiculous

He is no conservative, he doesn't support any conservative point, he hates status quo as much as Enjolras.

He's so full of self doubts and doubts in general that he wouldn't be able to commit to any praxis, he constantly second guess himself and I think many young people today relate to that so they sympathise with him. Instead of taking action he copes chasing dopamine to distract himself: food, alcohol, drugs, smoking, gambling, fighting, sex etc. He's in excruciating pain if he lets himself think without a buffer of distraction. But that's not being rational or sensible, this is avoidance and he knows it.

But Enjolras pushes him toward reality, toward a unfiltered vision of the world and of what it needs to be done. Enjolras is likely cold water in the face of the drunkard. Enjolras is right and Grantaire himself knows it. He also believes that Enjolras' determination is just and it's not mania. That's why he loves him.

And in the end he takes a stand beside Enjolras, because he loves him yes but you can read in the brick he shows in the eyes the lights of the battle his friends were in and he yells long live the Republic twice before asking Enjolras the permit to die with him, one was to attract the attention of the soldiers, one was a statement. He believes in the end and this is a positive development, so where do you get he was right all along in his nihilism?

romeomahbromeo
9260

As a rape survivor, I understand the need for safe space together – free from sexist harassment and potential violence. But fear of gender variance also can't be allowed to deceptively cloak itself as a women's safety issue. I can't think of a better example than my own, and my butch friends', first-hand experiences in public women's toilets. Of course women need to feel safe in a public restroom; that's a serious issue. So when a man walks in, women immediately examine the situation to see if the man looks flustered and embarrassed, or if he seems threatening; they draw on the skills they learned as young girls in this society to read body language for safety or danger.

Now, what happens when butches walk into the women's bathroom? Women nudge each other with elbows, or roll their eyes, and say mockingly, "Do you know which bathroom you're in?" Thats not how women behave when they really believe there's a man in the bathroom. This scenario is not about women's safety – its an example of gender-phobia.

And ask yourself, if you were in the women's bathroom, and there were two teenage drag queens putting on lipstick in front of the mirror, would you be in danger? If you called security or the cops, or forced those drag queens to use the men's room, would they be safe?

If the segregation of bathrooms is really about more than just genitals, then maybe the signs ought to read "Men" and "Sexually and Gender Oppressed," because we all need a safe place to go to the bathroom. Or even better, let's fight for clean individual bathrooms with signs on the doors that read "Restroom."

And defending the inclusion of transsexual sisters in women's space does not threaten the safety of any woman. The AIDS movement, for example, battled against the right-wing characterization of gay men as a "high-risk group." We won an understanding that there is no high-risk group – there are high-risk behaviors. Therefore, creating safety in women's space means we have to define unsafe behavior – like racist behavior by white women towards women of color, or dangerous insensitivity to disabilities.

Transsexual sisters are not a Trojan horse trying to infiltrate women's space. There have always been transsexual women helping to build the women's movement – they are part of virtually every large gathering of women. They want to be welcomed into women's space for the same reason every woman does – to feel safe.

Leslie Feinberg, Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to Marsha P. Johnson and Beyond